|
|
| The KleinPost |
|
|
| More Ask Felix |
| Click here to see all Ask Felix questions. |
| Ask Felix |
It’s always frustrating when I add a fund to a 401(k) menu and then a month or two later it drifts into another category. Not only do I need funds to fill specific slots, I need them to stay there. Can K4 Fund Selection help?

Of course it can! Although there’s no way to guarantee what a fund will do, K4 Fund Selection can help you select funds that are much less likely to drift out of the desired category. Not only can you select funds less likely to drift, you can also periodically review the funds to spot potential drifters before they make their move.
Before the Morningstar style box became well-known, most equity funds were free to invest anywhere in the domestic market. Managers moved around from value to growth or large to small caps depending on where they saw an opportunity. The S&P 500 was often used as the benchmark. As investors learned more about asset allocation and the application of Morningstar’s style box, they began looking for mangers who focused in specific styles and capitalizations. The rise in popularity of 401(k)s also added to the need for this type of targeted selection. As a result, more and more mutual funds began to concentrate in specific categories measuring themselves against their category-specific peers and benchmarks. So-called “multi-cap” funds still roam among various styles and capitalizations, but today most funds at least claim to adhere to a specific category.
It’s not just the multi-cap funds that drift around though; others do it, too, whether by design or accident. It sounds like you’ve run into some of them. The best way to avoid them is to identify the signs of a drifter. There are several things to look for and a K4 solution for each of them:
-- You can avoid concentrated funds by using the “Total Number of Stocks” filter to require a minimum of 50-60 stocks or even more. These larger portfolios are less likely to rapidly change categories.
-- You can use the R-Squared to the Category Index filter to screen out potential drifters. Generally you’d like to see an R-Squared of at least 70; anything lower should raise a red flag.
-- Use the “Best Fit Index”, “Equity Style Box – Cap”, and “Equity Style Box – Style” filters to check funds’ current affiliations. The Best Fit Index is really a closer proxy for the fund’s style and capitalization category.
-- If you use the Equity Style Box statistics as filters, they’ll eliminate funds with current styles or capitalizations that differ from their reported category. When this occurs, it suggests the fund may be in the course of drifting out of the category. As a result, you may not want to use it to represent that category.
Although these statistics can point out funds you may not want to add to your 401(k) lineup, don’t be too hasty to remove existing funds based on this information. Sometimes a fund’s Equity Style Statistics can change for a month or two, and then quickly return to the appropriate category. If you react too quickly, you may needlessly increase turnover. Instead of using these comparisons as sell signals, they are better used to identify funds to watch. This strategy gives you time to identify alternatives, if it does become necessary to remove them from the lineup.
So, K4 Fund Selection can help you find funds that are as faithful as Lassie. But use the information wisely! Fund managers may not see it as a compliment if you identify their funds as dogs!
![]()
![]()
Scoring Beats Screening for Mutual Fund Evaluation and Monitoring
For many investment professionals, mutual fund analysis, monitoring, and selection are an integral part of the services they provide. Like all investment decisions, this requires them to consider a number of different and often conflicting attributes. Long-term performance needs to be considered along with expense ratio and risk. Accurately measuring their relative importance and resolving the conflicts between them is a complex and difficult task. In addition, many are measured in different units making aggregation of the results impossible without a sophisticated scoring system. All of this can really only be accomplished with a clearly defined process that is quick, efficient, and objective. That is why these investment professionals need K4 Fund Selection.
K4 Fund Selection is an internet-based tool used to rank, evaluate and monitor mutual funds and ETFs. Unlike the pass/fail search and single point analysis methodologies used in other tools, K4 Fund Selection doesn’t simply eliminate funds based on equally-weighted stand-alone screens. Instead, it gives the user the ability to rigorously, objectively and easily create weighted factor models that score, rank and monitor funds on a number of attributes simultaneously. K4 Fund Selection yields a ranked list of all funds based on all their attributes and the importance the user places on each.
This ranking process not only resolves the major problems of pass/fail hurdles, but also eliminates the need to sort on individual attributes. With K4 Fund Selection’s comprehensive reporting and exporting capabilities, the user can quickly access a wealth of data for documentation, client presentations, and further analysis. When it’s time to re-evaluate or monitor funds, the entire process can be repeated with just a few clicks of the mouse, saving valuable time -- something most investment professionals can really use.
For more information, click here or call us at 919-233-6767.