|
|
| The KleinPost |
|
|
| More Models |
| Click here to see all models. |
| Looking for a model that is not listed. Click here to suggest it to us. |
| Model of the Quarter |
Categories, Factors, and Filters at a Glance
| Categories | Selections |
| Product Type | Fund |
| Asset Type | Bond |
| Track Record | 5 Years |
| Domestic Taxable Fixed Income | Intermediate Term Bond |
| Criteria | K4 Factor | Importance |
| Drag on Net Return | Expense Ratio | Medium |
| Total Risk | 5-Year Relative Standard Deviation | Lowest |
| Consistency | 5-Year Batting Average | Highest |
| Current Income | SEC Yield | Highest |
| Filter | Limits |
| 5-Year R-Squared (Category Index) | ≥ 75 |
| 5-Year Alpha (Category Index) | ≥ 0.01 |
| Average Credit Quality | AAA, AA |
| Percent in Stocks | ≤ 0 |
| Percent in Preferreds | ≤ 5 |
| Percent in Convertibles | ≤ 5 |
| Distinct Portfolio | Yes |
Klein Decisions’ K4 Fund Selection allows you to easily find and rank high quality intermediate term bond funds. The best actively managed bond funds consistently beat their respective benchmarks, but the margins tend to be slim. Batting Average can measure a fund’s consistency, while a lower standard deviation relative to the benchmark assures the fund is not assuming an inordinate level of risk. Higher current yield and low expenses can also help enhance net total return.
Bonds move through cycles just like stocks, so it’s a good idea to focus on 5-Year statistics to get a longer view. To assure that all funds can be scored on each factor, you’ll also want to require a track record of five years or more. This will limit your universe while focusing on proven long-term performers.
Here’s what a High Quality Intermediate Bond Fund Model might look like:
| Criteria | K4 Factor | Importance |
| Drag on Net Return | Expense Ratio | Medium |
| Total Risk | 5-Year Relative Standard Deviation | Lowest |
| Consistency | 5-Year Batting Average | Highest |
| Current Income | SEC Yield | Highest |
| Filter | Limits |
| 5-Year R-Squared (Category Index) | ≥ 75 |
| 5-Year Alpha (Category Index) | ≥ 0.01 |
| Average Credit Quality | AAA, AA |
| Percent in Stocks | ≤ 0 |
| Percent in Preferreds | ≤ 5 |
| Percent in Convertibles | ≤ 5 |
| Distinct Portfolio | Yes |
This model focuses on factors that affect consistency and long-term net return. The 5-Year Alpha filter limits the universe of funds to those that have actually added extra value. There’s no need to consider funds that don’t, because index funds would do as well (if not better) without the additional expense of active management. The R-Squared filter assures that the fund reasonably tracks its benchmark (the Lehman Brothers 5-10 Year Government/Credit Index) and that the Alpha measure is statistically meaningful. Average Credit Quality is limited to the top two ratings to assure high quality. The Distinct Portfolio filter is used to restrict the rankings to one unique share class for each fund. The remaining filters restrict the funds’ holdings in common stocks, preferred stocks, and convertible securities, guaranteeing the primary assets are bonds and cash.
To use this same scenario for other categories (e.g. High Quality Long Term Bonds):
Once you’ve established all your scenarios, you can then use them to monitor the funds. When it’s time to review them, simply copy and rename each scenario with the current date. When you open the new copy, you can proceed directly to the Results page and view the updated data. The update is automatic and you don’t even need to answer the questions on the Category or Preference tabs. You can now compare the current results to those in the original scenario. This is also a simple means of creating an ongoing history of your analyses to track the funds over time.